65°
Cloudy
FRI
 84°
 56°
SAT
 89°
 55°
SUN
 87°
 55°
MON
 88°
 56°
TUE
 83°
 56°

Last hours to vote for the Best of Sonoma County finalists! Don't miss out!

PD Editorial: Santa Rosa Plaza's muddled policy on speech

  • Russell Aharonian was suspended from his job as chief of security at Santa Rosa Plaza after an incident involving the parents of Andy Lopez. (JOHN BURGESS / The Press Democrat)

Are security officers at Santa Rosa Plaza taking the fall for the mall's corporate owners for the unfortunate confrontation with Andy Lopez activists concerning T-shirts they were wearing?

It sure looks that way. That's especially true for former Security Director Russell Aharonian who says that shortly after the T-shirt episode on Feb. 17, he was asked to clean out his desk.

As Aharonian told Staff Writer Martin Espinoza, he and his officers guards were only following the plaza's conduct policy when they confronted the activists in the food court and asked them to remove their T-shirts, turn them inside out or leave. Among those confronted were Lopez's parents.

There's no question that this whole episode — including the adoption of a dubious policy banning signs, banners and T-shirts on the day of a protest — has been handled poorly. Who really would regard a T-shirt that reads “RIP, Andy” and features a photo of the 13-year-old boy who was shot by a sheriff's deputy five months ago as a threat to the sanctity of the mall? Aharonian's termination, if it was a direct result of this confrontation, has only made this case more troubling.

In its public apology two weeks ago, attorneys for Simon Property Group, the owner of the mall, said the company was “deeply disappointed that security officers at Santa Rosa Plaza inappropriately addressed a group of visitors.” But the mall had a policy and practice of cracking down on attire, one that was put in place around the time of the Occupy movement. The question is whether the security guards and Aharonian in particular handled the encounter in a way so different from previous ones and so egregious as to warrant discipline and possible termination.

In our view, the real problem was not the policing but the policy itself, one that not only trampled on individual rights of expression but appears to run contrary to established case law.

comments powered by Disqus
© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View