Santa Rosa faces many challenges in the months ahead, as underscored in the financial overview presented to the City Council on Tuesday. But no decision the council will make this year will be more important than picking a successor to City Manager Kathy Millison. No decision is likely to test this council's strained ability to work together as much as this one either.
History is not on the council's side. The last time Santa Rosa's elected leaders were asked to select a new city manager during an election year, the result was dissension and bitterness. It included a deep rift over the naming of an interim city manager, open disagreements over the search for a new top executive and a 4-3 split over the final selection of Millison in July 2010.
But there's reason to be optimistic this time around. First, Millison, to her credit, has given the City Council six months to find her replacement before she retires, which eliminates the need to find an interim city manager, the decision that triggered so much tension and backlash last time. Her long-term notice also provides ample time for the city to cast a wide net for applicants and go through the selection process.
But the burden still falls on this divided council to come to agreement on a city manager who not only will help Santa Rosa address its long-term needs but ensure the city is moving forward in executing the vision set forth in endless documents on shelves at City Hall. These include plans for creating transit-oriented mixed-use development at Railroad Square, reunifying Old Courthouse Square, rebuilding and possibly relocating City Hall and remodeling that old eyesore AT&T building downtown — a project that has been anticipated for years but has yet to come to fruition.
Granted, many of these projects have been held up or torpedoed for reasons beyond the city's control — the collapse of the housing market, the governor's elimination of redevelopment, the recession, etc. But that makes it all the more urgent that the City Council find a top administrator with a vision not just for what the city needs — a topic that requires little further debate — but how to make it happen in an era of limited resources and fewer development tools with which public agencies have to work.