Skin in the game
EDITOR: Paul Gullixson's comparison of Supervisor Efren Carrillo's boldness in declaring the creation of Sonoma Clean Power as the “county's moment” to David Farragut's battle orders at Mobile Bay couldn't have been more ironic. How each “took control” involved a very different understanding of experience, risk and skin in the game (“Now it's time for the cities to decide,” Sunday).
At Mobile Bay, Farragut brought more than a half-century's experience in naval warfare, including eyewitness knowledge that Civil War era torpedoes (mines) were highly unreliable. That experience taught Farragut that running a gantlet of unreliable mines compared to naval- and shore-based guns, posed less risk to his men, whose skin was, literally, invested in the game.
Fast forward to county supervisors. None has any experience in running a power company, yet they have placed all risk of their knowledge deficit on taxpayers. Why not lay the risk of their venture on other people's money when it can be taken by force of involuntary taxation and without a vote?
I propose a re-vote on Sonoma Clean Power — after the supervisors are required to put all future taxpayer-funded pension and health benefits at risk to offset any losses from their venture in the power business. Farragut would understand that commitment as skin in the game.
SR parking meters
EDITOR: Evidently Staff Writer Kevin McCallum has never been disabled nor has he attempted to use the new meters with small children in tow (“SR revisits parking meters,” Thursday). His comment, “The disabled or merely lazy complained about the extra steps involved, even though the kiosks were rarely more than a few yards away,” is highly offensive, even to those of us who simply find it inconvenient. There is no call to insult those who dislike the new meters; we all have valid reasons that form our opinions, and that does not make one lazy.