Refunds for credit card users
Last Modified: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 1:51 p.m.
NEW YORK — Citigroup Inc. will pay nearly $18 million in refunds and settlement charges for taking $14 million from customers’ credit card accounts, California’s attorney general said Tuesday.
Citigroup will make refunds to the 53,000 customers affected, and pay $3.5 million in damages and civil penalties to the state of California, which had been investigating the questionable practices for three years, the attorney general said.
The bank will also pay 10 percent interest to California customers, who accounted for $1.6 million of the money “swept” out of accounts and into a Citi fund between 1992 and 2003.
Citigroup’s “account sweeping program” automatically removed positive balances from customers’ credit card accounts, Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. said. For instance, if a customer double-paid a bill by mistake or refunded a purchase for credit, that positive balance was then taken from the customer without notification, Brown said.
“The company knowingly stole from its customers, mostly poor people and the recently deceased, when it designed and implemented the sweeps,” said Brown in a statement. “When a whistleblower uncovered the scam and brought it to his superiors, they buried the information and continued the illegal practice.”
Citigroup, however, said in a statement that it voluntarily stopped the computerized “sweeping” practice in 2003, and that it also voluntarily began refunding customers before the settlement.
“We take issue with the state’s characterization of our conduct and the parties’ voluntary settlement,” Citigroup said in a statement.
“This agreement affirms our actions, and we are continuing to make full refunds to all affected customers,” Citigroup said.
Citigroup shares rose 23 cents, or 1.3 percent, to $17.84 Tuesday.
Next Article in
Events Calendar More Events Submit Event
- Fatal accident ties up traffic on Hwy. 101 south
- 49ers make the grade in Buffalo
- For a change, 49ers finish what they start
- Passenger killed in Petaluma crash
- Pit bulls on the attack in Mendocino
- Cornerback Clements excels against his former team
- Guardsmen say goodbye
- Do you read the TOS?
- Man missing after falling from cliff into ocean in Mendocino
- 113-mph Mini tops 60 speeding tickets
- Plea deal for 8-year-old in Arizona killings up in air 4 min ago
- SAN DIEGO Two guilty of man's kidnapping 4 min ago
- CARMEL VALLEY 3 held after cockfighting raid 4 min ago
- SAN FRANCISCO 300 hold vigil for Mumbai victims 4 min ago
- Artist collects postcards to Obama 4 min ago
- Judges to rule on crowded prisons 4 min ago
- Shuttle landing moved to California 4 min ago
- Rescuers continue search for man on Mendocino coast 4 min ago
- Cost a barrier to vaccines 4 min ago
- OBITUARIES 4 min ago

Comments
Only moderator-approved comments are shown on this page. To see all comments, please visit the forum.Post a comment | View all comments on this topic.
August 26, 2008 8:12:19 pm
RE: http://www.pressdemocrat.com/a...826/NEWS07/808260278
Cant bank robbers just return the money they stole? This is the fallacy of our state and federal govt. Business is immune from criminal prosecution, corrupt judges and mayors etc are exempt from civil suits, etc etc etc.
Why werent those who initiated this practice charged with a criminal offense?
August 27, 2008 7:52:50 am
Not only do they get to just 'return he money' and get away with it, they will be able to raise their fee's and interest rates to help cover the "increased legal expenses occurred in the last fiscal year".
It won't cost them a penny in the long run.
Post a comment | View all comments