Petaluma murder case returned to juvenile court
Last Modified: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 at 5:18 p.m.
Ruling that police “inadvertently” failed to disclose pertinent evidence in a murder case, a Sonoma County Superior Court judge Wednesday sent a teenage defendant back to Juvenile Court so the original judge can hear the new testimony.
Gibb Theopolis Olivarez, who turns 18 in two weeks, is charged with murder in the Dec. 17, 2006, stabbing of Nathaniel Reifers, 31, and assault in the stabbing of Salvatore Cucci Jr., 25, behind a row of bars and restaurants in downtown Petaluma.
Although he was 16 at the time, Juvenile Court Judge Mark Tansil ruled in June last year after a multi-day hearing that Olivarez should be tried as an adult because of the seriousness of the accusations.
But his defense team argued that the testimony of one witness, which police didn’t disclose until months after the juvenile hearing, may have changed Tansil’s mind about sending the case to adult court.
His attorneys say the witness’ statements support their theory that Olivarez wasn’t the aggressor and may have been defending himself in the two stabbing incidents. Prosecutors disagree, saying the testimony backs up their theory of murder.
The stakes are enormous for Olivarez. If convicted in Juvenile Court, he could be held until age 25; in adult court, he could be sent to prison for the rest of his life.
Petaluma Police Detective Mike Pierre said Olivarez stabbed Cucci after he refused to buy alcohol for the minor. Cucci at first accepted money from Olivarez but then returned it before a fight ensued and Olivarez stabbed Cucci in the thigh.
A crowd of between five and 15 adults then chased Olivarez, and during a second confrontation Reifers was stabbed five times, once in the heart. Olivarez was also stabbed four times and beaten by the crowd.
No knives were recovered and no one has been arrested for Olivarez’s wounds.
Conflicting witness statements to police have added to confusion over how Reifers and Olivarez both were stabbed. Many of the victims’ friends refused to speak with police initially and at least two were granted immunity before they spoke.
Several have since given statements.
The testimony of the new witness, who Pierre interviewed last July 5 but didn’t log into evidence until late October, may be the focus of a new hearing before Tansil.
Judge Ken Gnoss ordered that Olivarez be returned to court on Wednesday to set a hearing date in Juvenile Court. He is being held in juvenile detention.
Next Article in
Events Calendar More Events Submit Event
- Downloading the law, one document at a time
- Draft picks probably a year away
- Body found buried in pot farm
- Friend: Man shot himself playing Russian roulette
- Oakland keeps McFadden a mystery
- Body found in pot garden linked to SR missing person
- SRJC building repair costing millions
- It's how hot?
- Hells Angel faced county charges
- Friday and Saturday predictions
- ACLU suit targets Sheriff's Department
- Palin didn't sell state jet on eBay as implied
- 101 widening winds down
- Man ordered to trial in stabbing of girl
- Rangel's mortgage at resort cost little
- Hwy. 101 widening finish just weeks away
- Body found buried in pot farm
- SF delays implementing resident ID card program pending review
- Antioch woman has West Nile virus
- FDA lists possibly harmful drugs 13 min ago
- The candidates, the issues 17 min ago
- Turtle rescuers 21 min ago
- 101 widening winds down 22 min ago
- Where the votes are 30 min ago
- Rohnert Park holds key to race's outcome 43 min ago
- Pier faces uphill battle against incumbent Brown 43 min ago
- Candidates focus on capturing Sebastopol votes 44 min ago
- Guilty plea in drug case 1 hr ago
- Ex-Lake man found guilty in shooting 1 hr ago

Comments
Post a comment | View all comments on this topic.
August 6, 2008 1:55:51 pm
RE: http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20080806/NEWS/473799288
Good for the Attorney for Mr. Olivarez....the TRUTH about how those "men" (supposedly) attacked this kid is finally coming out!!! Grown men out drinking (who commented saying they NEVER go OUT!) looking for trouble!! Plus 2 of them were granted Immunity & REFUSE to speak....COME ON!!...tell me that doesn't smell fishy!!
There should be a mistrail & let the kid go for all this time being in jail...only seems right...Free the kid for the stupidity of drunk men covering their a**es!!
August 6, 2008 2:01:38 pm
Give him a trial as an adult. The facts will support the verdict and the result will determine his fate. Simple
August 6, 2008 3:41:58 pm
Let's see the the kid got his money back after attempting to break the law and then stabs the guy who gave him his money...What an *******...Due Process This!!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 6, 2008 3:51:27 pm
Told ya this is how this one would go!
Those guys were trying to take the law into their own hands and they chased down an underage guy, and he was acting in self-defense when he stabbed the one guy to death.
He might just get off.
August 6, 2008 6:41:53 pm
Viva Mexico!!!!!!All Mexican children should carry knives to protect themselves.
August 6, 2008 6:46:13 pm
Sorry , you cant use a deadly weapon if someone is threatening you with fists. The guy just gets manslaughter if he's lucky. If he was a white guy he'd be in jail for life and his family sued for everything they owned
Post a comment | View all comments