Cash-strapped SR could seek shift in Measure O funds
Last Modified: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 5:22 a.m.
Santa Rosa officials may consider reallocating revenue from a sales tax that funds some public safety expenses in order to preserve other police and fire services.
Citing dire budget projections, city staff members Tuesday suggested the City Council look into using Measure O money to pay for some police positions financed by the general fund and targeted for cuts.
"If we were just talking about little things, we might be able to figure something out," said Michael Frank, assistant city manager. "But the numbers we're looking at mean reducing areas that Measure O is funding."
Santa Rosa voters approved the quarter-cent sales tax measure in 2004, and it provides $7 million annually for police, fire and gang prevention services.
The terms of Measure O specify its revenue cannot be spent on items financed by the city's general fund unless the City Council votes to declare a fiscal crisis.
Frank said next year's budget outlook is so bleak, such a vote will likely be necessary.
"Police and fire make up 64 percent of the general fund resources, so reductions will have to occur in those departments," Frank said. "The question is, will Measure O pick up those positions that we have to cut? No one wants the money to sit there and not be used."
The Police Department has a large amount of Measure O funds saved up, Frank said, while the Fire Department, in the midst of building a new fire station on Lewis Road, does not have significant amounts saved. Measure O funds are split evenly between police and fire.
Frank said if the council were to reallocate some Measure O funds, the money would not be used to pay for costs outside of public safety.
To balance the city's current 2008-09 budget, the council approved last month $5 million in cuts and fee increases. But officials still predict a $8 million deficit for the 2009-10 fiscal year.
Decreases in sales tax revenues and property related fees and taxes are responsible for a $9.4 million gap between Santa Rosa's revenues today and those that were projected three years ago, Frank said.
"Our revenues pretty much fell off a cliff," he said.
The city held a special budget study session Tuesday for those interested in running for the five council seats that will be open in the November election.
A similar presentation was made by City Manager Jeff Kolin at the City Council's regular meeting Tuesday.
Councilmember Lee Pierce said the presentation was "only the beginning" of difficult discussions, including a potential vote to declare a fiscal crisis.
Pierce said while he considered it clear that the city is facing one, any change in the allocation of Measure O funds would not win his vote.
Apart from reallocating Measure O money, staff members gave candidates and council members a laundry list of potential closures and reductions that could help bridge the shortfall.
The options include closing the city's Senior Center, reducing pothole patching, closing some neighborhood parks and cutting back on maintenance, turning off half of all street lights and reducing free recreation programs.
Staff also raised the possibility of eliminating 29 sworn and civilian police employees, closing a fire station, reducing neighborhood traffic patrols and eliminating the community Emergency Preparedness Program.
In addition, the City Council is scheduled Tuesday to consider placing on the November ballot another quarter-cent sales tax measure that would supplement the general fund.
Potential council candidates at the study session said they supported budget solutions other than dipping into Measure O revenue.
"If my house is on fire, I want a firefighter there, not a city planner," said candidate Hans Dippel, who said he was against voting to declare a fiscal crisis for the city.
"I don't like the option," said candidate Bobbi Hoff. "As a city you have to have basic services, safety, recreation and roads. Those are core services."
Six council members would have to vote to reallocate Measure O revenue, according to rules voters approved when they passed the tax.
Candidate Judy Kennedy said she needed more information about the budget and Measure O before making a decision. But if it came to using Measure O money to pay for general fund police positions, "I wouldn't discount it," she said.
Dippel, Hoff, Kennedy, Michael Allen and Gary Wysocky attended the candidates' session and said they were not surprised by the city's financial straits but might try and look for options other than cutting services.
"We need to address where we're getting money from and look at bringing jobs here," Wysocky said.
You can reach Staff Writer Laura Norton at 521-5220
or laura.norton@
pressdemocrat.com.
Next Article in
Events Calendar More Events Submit Event
- Downloading the law, one document at a time
- Bay Area Hells Angel leader killed
- Doctors mystified by death
- A tale of two quarterbacks
- Old map may settle bike path dispute
- Santa Rosa police hit pot operation
- Woman disappears on walk
- SR man dies in crash at resort
- Developer brings vision to Occidental
- Woman leaps from trunk of own car
- Key 101 ramp to close over weekend
- Doctors mystified by death
- Bay Area Hells Angel leader killed
- Forestville home burns
- Old map may settle bike path dispute
- Morning crashes slow 101 commute
- Three men arrested in possible burglary
- Pot plants seized
- Police nab 3 linked in robbery spree
- Developer brings vision to Occidental
- Rohnert Park Vet Writes Book 3 min ago
- Johnson catches on with 49ers 7 min ago
- Guillen leads Royals' doubleheader sweep 8 min ago
- Stadium lighting project nearly complete at Maria Carrillo 15 min ago
- Healdsburg's Mendez coaching against his son 15 min ago
- Dismal farm system now rated the best 17 min ago
- Heat wave arrives for the weekend 32 min ago
- 60-Sec Weekend: Rockin' the Yo-Yo 58 min ago
- Seawolves romp again 58 min ago
- McCain's promise: 'Change is coming' 2 hrs ago

Comments
Post a comment | View all comments on this topic.
July 23, 2008 8:03:23 am
RE: http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20080723/news/807230369
When it's all said and done, the Police and Fire unions will not allow a city council to divert Measure O funds, unless they are diverted to the specific benifit of the Police and Fire Departments.
This is why you never vote for tax increases.
Do you really think they will stop patching the roads, or close a fire station? Give me a break.
Get ready for more "fees" folks, they are on the way. Those people who don't run governments call "fees" "taxes by another name".
64% of the city's budget for Police and Fire protection. The city is running out of money and the unions are doing their best to get more and more money and benifits from them. All on the back of the tax payer. Sounds more like Vallejo every day.
July 23, 2008 7:23:51 pm
The story reports that,
"The city held a special budget study session Tuesday for those interested in running for the five council seats that will be open in the November election."
But the agenda for yesterday's meeting didn't say any such thing:
"2.1 BUDGET AND FINANCIAL UPDATE
The purpose of this study session is to update the Council on the current budget and financial status, and to outline and discuss the potential options, both revenue and expenditure related, to address the issues raised. The Council may discuss these matters. No Council action will be taken."
Maybe that's why only five of the 14 announced candidates showed up, to be interviewed by the PD.
July 23, 2008 10:18:32 pm
FORTUNATELY THEY CAN ONLY TAX 100 PERCENT OF WHAT WE MAKE...THEN IT IS OVER....AND IT MAY COME SOONER THAN ANYONE THINKS. YES 64 PERCENT OF THE BUDGET TODAY ...AND WITHIN 5 YEARS OR LESS IT WILL BE JUST ABOUT ALL OF IT ...AND WE WILL TELL THEM TO GO TO HELL
July 24, 2008 3:15:24 pm
Funny the City is now claiming public safety uses 64% of the funds. A friend of mine did a little survey and found that all but 2 departments budgets (out of 11) grew by a greater percentage over the last 20 years over and above the FD & PD. Also, if you look at the CAFR (comprehensive annual finicial report) the City has to put out every year 52% of the funds. Yes, it is still a bit but, who do you want a 3 AM when you need them a Cop or a private security guard?
Post a comment | View all comments