Petaluma council to seek fireworks compromise
Last Modified: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 at 3:37 p.m.
Petaluma City Council members decided late Monday to work with the fireworks industry to find a compromise to an outright ban on personal pyrotechnics.
Mayor Pam Torliatt had sought to put a measure on the November ballot banning all fireworks, including the state-approved "safe and sane" variety.
But only one other council member, Teresa Barrett, joined with her in supporting that effort, which could cost the city as much as $14,000.
None of the seven supported a second option, a city ordinance banning fireworks, believing it would spark a costly legal fight with the powerful industry and hurt nonprofit groups who sell fireworks.
A five-member majority supported modifying the city's existing ordinance to reduce the number of days fireworks can be sold and used and increasing fines for violators.
The compromise was proposed by Dennis Revell, a fireworks industry spokesman, who also said he spoke for 16 of the city's nonprofits that sell fireworks.
Nonprofit groups say they can make as much as $15,000 a year selling items that spark, glow and flash, but don't explode or fly through the air.
But others have sought to ban them, saying they are a noisy fire hazard.
There hasn't been a significant fireworks-related fire since 1996, Fire Marshal Michael Ginn said, and two serious injuries in the past six years.
Staff members will research possible changes to the ordinance and discuss them with nonprofit representatives before returning to the council for a possible vote.
Councilman Mike O'Brien suggested the city explore a five-year phase-out so nonprofits can find other funding sources.
Petaluma, Cloverdale, Sebastopol and Rohnert Park are the only areas in Sonoma County where the sale or use of home fireworks is allowed.
Events Calendar More Events Submit Event
- Downloading the law, one document at a time
- Man drowns in Bodega surf
- Petaluma police arrest 30 drivers
- Meth bust nets 3 Santa Rosa men
- Mom, 2 kids struck by car
- 3 family members hit by van in Santa Rosa crosswalk
- Players eager to unwrap game plan
- Officer, 2 others killed in gun fight
- Drowning victim ID'd
- Surf takes life at Bodega Bay
- Petaluma police arrest 30 drivers
- An Icon's Struggle
- Man drowns in Bodega surf
- Belarus teen seeking student visa
- Meth bust nets 3 Santa Rosa men
- Officer, 2 others killed in gun fight
- Sonoma Valley wastewater clean enough to recycle
- As temps soar, activities plummet
- 4 get jail terms in death of surfer
- Hiker missing in mountains
- RAIDERS: Receiver shortage is contagious 5 min ago
- Murray stuns No. 1 Nadal in US Open semifinals 29 min ago
- Belarus teen seeking student visa 4 hrs ago
- Officer, 2 others killed in gun fight 4 hrs ago
- Cajun flair 4 hrs ago
- New Meth bust nets 3 Santa Rosa men 7 hrs ago
- Horoscopes for September 7th 9 hrs ago
- Man drowns in Bodega surf 10 hrs ago
- Sonoma Valley wastewater clean enough to recycle 10 hrs ago
- Guilty finding in race-based killings 10 hrs ago

Comments
Post a comment | View all comments on this topic.
July 22, 2008 9:29:13 am
RE: http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20080722/NEWS/807220420
I'm glad that Mayor Torliatt and the city council found time to deal with something really dangerous like safe and sane fireworks and did not get sidetracked with the 20 shots being fired into a house across town. Who cares about those eastsiders anyway?
July 22, 2008 4:56:16 pm
The Mayor is on the right track, a total ban is in order. It has gone too far from a safety and environmental stand point. The non profits will find other revenue sources and whats up with the city getting sued by the fireworks lobby? is it a right to sell fireworks thing? Sounds like an excuse.
Post a comment | View all comments